The United States has agreed to a $15 per tonne carbon tax, the first such rate since a U.N. deal to cut carbon emissions that took effect in Paris last year.

The tax is expected to raise $20 billion over the next two years.

Oak and Coal, a major coal producer in Kentucky, have been the biggest winners of the tax, and both are expected to reap significant profits from it.

The company also has been the largest beneficiary of the carbon price.

Oak is a big player in the Appalachian region.

It’s one of the largest producers of the product in the U.S., and its operations are the country’s biggest in the heart of the Appalachian mountains.

The coal companies have been fighting against a carbon tax since 2014, when the president announced the plan and the industry lobbied hard for it.

It also has notched $5 billion in profits since the tax was introduced.

The biggest loser from the tax has been coal.

Oak has been paying billions of dollars in taxes to the federal government and state governments since 2015, according to the U and Kentucky officials.

The state has been trying to get a deal in place with the coal companies to keep the tax on the books.

The companies have argued that they’re making enough money from the coal industry that they should pay the taxes.

The government agreed to pay the companies a total of $3.8 billion in taxes and penalties, but the company still owes nearly $3 billion.

The money will be paid by the U of C and other state governments, who will share the remaining $1.4 billion.

It could take up to two years for the federal and state government to pay off the remaining money, the officials said.

But Kentucky is hoping that the federal administration will agree to the state’s request to pay part of the $1 billion.

So far, the administration has not agreed.

The administration’s proposal calls for the Treasury Department to pay at least half of the remaining debt through 2019.

That could put Oak and its other creditors on the hook for a total amount of about $4 billion if the federal tax goes through, according the Kentucky officials and Oak’s financial filings.

The U.K. government has said that it doesn’t want to take the additional federal payments, as they’re based on what’s already been paid by Oak and other coal companies.

The Treasury Department and the U .


Department of Energy, which are also part of Treasury’s coal market oversight team, are negotiating a solution.

They’re trying to find ways to pay Oak’s debts, the U Kentucky officials said in a statement.

The two sides have not finalized an agreement on the remaining amount of the debt, but they have been working on it, they added.

The Kentucky officials stressed that Oak has already paid off its debts and that it would not make any more debt payments.

Oak said the Treasury’s proposal was “an effort to avoid having to negotiate new obligations from Oak or other companies and would only have the effect of delaying our ability to continue to sell our product.”

It’s not clear if that’s going to happen.

If the plan proceeds, Oak will likely make an additional $1 to $2 billion in profit, according a person familiar with the matter.

That would help pay off its debt, the person said.

The Trump administration’s plan is expected in the next couple of weeks.

But that will depend on how quickly the U S. Treasury Department settles on a settlement, the company said in its financial filing.

That may depend on the federal agency that will settle with Oak, and how quickly it settles on an agreement with Oak.

“As we’ve indicated previously, our position is that it’s premature to comment on any settlement process,” the company’s financial statement said.

A Treasury Department official, who declined to be named because the department is not commenting on a pending case, said the department was in the process of reaching out to the companies to try to get them to agree to a deal.